Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Locator attachment¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇÏ¾Ç ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯ÁöÇü ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡ÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû Æò°¡

Clinical evaluation of implant retained overdentures using two implant and Locator attachments in the fully edentulous mandibles

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 49±Ç 4È£ p.283 ~ 290
ÀÌÁÖÇü, ¼Õµ¿¼®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÁÖÇü ( Lee Ju-Hyoung ) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¼Õµ¿¼® ( Sohn Dong-Seok ) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¿¬±¸¸ñÀû: Çö´ëÀÇÇÐÀÇ ¹ß´Þ·Î Æò±Õ ¼ö¸íÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í °í·ÉÀÇ È¯ÀÚ°¡ ´Ã¾î³²¿¡ µû¶ó ¹«Ä¡¾Ç ȯÀÚÀÇ ºñÀ²µµ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ƯÈ÷ ½ÉÇÏ°Ô Èí¼öµÈ ÇϾǰñ¿¡¼± ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÃÑÀÇÄ¡·Î´Â ȯÀÚ°¡ »ç¿ëÇϱ⿡ À¯Áö, ÁöÁöÀÇ ºÎÁ·À¸·Î »ç¿ë»ó¿¡ ¾î·Á¿òÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ÇϾǿ¡ 2°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ® ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿© ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇϸé ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô Á» ´õ »ç¿ëÇϱⰡ ÆíÇÑ ÀÇÄ¡¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇØ ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. °£´ÜÇÑ º¸Ã¶°úÁ¤°ú ÃßÈÄ ¼ö¸®°¡ ½±´Ù´Â ÀÌÀ¯·Î ÇöÀç Locator°¡ º¸ÆíÀûÀÎ À¯ÁöÀåÄ¡·Î »ç¿ëµÇ°í ÀÖ´Ù. Locator¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÇÏ¾Ç ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡¿¡¼­ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿Í º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ Àå±âÀûÀÎ ¼º°ø·üÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù.

¿¬±¸ Àç·á ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇк´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¿Ü°ú¿¡¼­ 2004³âºÎÅÍ 2010³â±îÁö ÃÑ 10¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ(³² 4¸í, ¿© 6¸í)ÀÇ ÇϾǿ¡ 2°³ÀÇ ÀÓÇöõÆ®(ÃÑ 20°³)¸¦ ½Ä¸³ ÈÄLocator¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á¶Á÷-À¯Áö ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡¸¦ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÃÖ±Ù 7³â°£ ½Ã¼úµÈ 10¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Áø·á ±â·ÏºÎ¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ°í ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁøÀ» °èÃøÇÏ¿© ÈÄÇâÀû Àӻ󿬱¸¸¦ ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ »ýÁ¸·ü ¹× º¸Ã¶ÀûÀÎ ÇÕº´Áõ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù.

°á°ú: ÀÓÇöõÆ®´Â 100%ÀÇ ´©Àû ¼º°ø·üÀ» º¸¿´°í, 1³âÈÄ(Æò±Õ 58ÁÖ) ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø¿¡¼­ ÀÓÇöõÆ®´Â Æò±Õ 1.03 mm ¡¾ 0.20ÀÇ °ñ¼Ò½ÇÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ ±â´É¿¡´Â ÀÌ»óÀ» º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡´Â ÀÇÄ¡ÆÄÀý, ÀÇÄ¡»ó ÀÌÀå ¶Ç´Â °³»ó, ¸ÞÀÏÀÇ Å»¶ô ¶Ç´Â À¯Áö·Â °¨¼Ò·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¸ÞÀÏ ±³Ã¼ µî ´Ù¾çÇÑ ÇÕº´ÁõÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ÀÇÄ¡»ó ÀÌÀå ¹× °³»ó, ¸ÞÀÏ ÀνáÆ®ÀÇ °£´ÜÇÑ ±³Ã¼·Î ÀÎÇØ Àå±âÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÓÇöõÆ® ¹× ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡°¡ ȯÀÚ¿¡°Ô À¯ÁöµÇ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ÇÏ¾Ç Àü¹æºÎÀ§¿¡ ÀÓÇöõÆ® 2°³¸¦ ½Ä¸³ ÈÄ Locator¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯Áö ÇÏ¾Ç ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡´Â ÃÖ¼Òħ½ÀÀûÀÎ ¼ö¼ú, °£´ÜÇÑ º¸Ã¶ °úÁ¤ ¹× ¼ö¸® °úÁ¤ÀÇ ÀåÁ¡À¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Àå±âÀûÀ¸·Î ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á¹ýÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.

Purpose: This study compared the marginal bone loss around dental implant that were placed in the canine areas of the mandibles and finded the survival rate of implants, marginal bone loss around implants and prosthetic complications in 10 patients treated with overdentures retained with Locator attachments.

Methods and Methods: Ten patients who had received implant retained overdentures in the mandibules using two implants and Locator attachments at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center from 2004 to 2010 were included in this study. Evaluations of the survival rate of implants, marginal bone loss and prosthetic complications were performed.

b>Results:. Implants placed in this study showed a 100% survival rate and the average annual bone loss was 1.03 mm ¡¾ 0.20 mm in the first year. The patients have verbally indicated that they are comfortable and that their overdentures function well. But, implant retained overdentures had various prosthetic complications such as male change, relining, rebasing and denture fracture.

Conslusion: Implant retained overdentures using two implant and Locator attachments in the fully edentulous mandibles is considered as a stable way for long terms because of minimal invasive operation, simple prosthetic process and easy repair.

Å°¿öµå

ÇÏ¾Ç ÀÓÇöõÆ® À¯ÁöÇü ÇÇ°³ÀÇÄ¡ Locator attachment; ÀÓÇöõÆ® ÁÖÀ§ º¯¿¬°ñ Èí¼ö º¸Ã¶ÀûÀÎ ÇÕº´Áõ
Mandible; Implant retained overdenture; Locator attachment; Marginal bone loss around implant; Prosthetic complication

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed